The Human / Leader Paradox

Comment

The Human / Leader Paradox

We love when a leader shows superhuman abilities. It tells us that they have earned their place as a leader because they can indeed show up better than we can and better than we can.

But it always seems to turn out to be a lie.

Leaders may have great abilities (or just charisma) but it's always anyone's guess how far they have learned to master the power given to them by their role.

Abilities (and the right mentors) offer some capacity to use power well, but only experience can truly lead to mastery... if such experience doesn't lead to downfall first.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

When Responsibility Meets Accountability

Comment

When Responsibility Meets Accountability

"How have you abused your power?
How have you abused your power?
How have you abused your power?"

At first, in my mind's eye, I was speaking loudly to someone I had experienced as clearly abusing their power, and as I was doing so, I knew full well that I eventually would need to answer as if I was sitting in their shoes.

Except I didn't, not exactly.

I was doing an aspecting session, and in one such a session it is only with me, myself, and I—and any and all archetypes willing to show up. I speak as one, and then I move to the other side of the pillow and I answer as another.

(click the title to read more)

Comment

The Importance of Darkness

Comment

The Importance of Darkness

(I wrote this a few years ago after a mediation I went through with someone in another community)

Whenever we witness a conflict between two people, one of the most difficult things to do is to establish what is actually happening between them.

Mostly, it’s impossible.

You might be unlucky enough to speak to one person first and hear them speak of the other person in the most demonizing ways they can. And this will play into any biases you already have about any group they might appear to be a part of.

What happens when the person being demonized is a man? How easy is it to perceive them according to the new narratives emerging about them? About us?

I’ve spent 30 years digging deep into myself around this, from the time I was with my first and second girlfriend, both having been assaulted and abused by men. And during these years, I explored not only the ways there might be such a dangerous man inside of me, but also the ways he might be inside of other men.

30 years of exploring my own misandry.

Because yes, we men are capable of such things.

But not because we are men.

Over the years, I learned that violence, awfulness, and abuse are not just the domain of men, they are the domain of humans.

And women are just as capable of such things. It may look different, but there’s no less primal and tribal capacity for such things in them. Not that the current narrative about women would allow you to see this. No, patriarchy is all about men… and those who raised them. Right?

Everyone can be awful. Or awful to each other. And the more I explore the nature of conflict, the more I realize this. Whatever the reasons are--self-preservation, safety, reason, protection, morality, purpose, etc--we are capable of exacting really awful things on each other even while we believe we are doing good or well or right or simply the best we can.

The mistake we make is to believe we have risen above this limbic pit.

We haven’t.

All I can say is this: conflict arises when we can’t find a better way, when we don’t understand, when we’re mislead, when we’re unable to really get what’s happening on the other side. So we make assumptions. We judge. We call out. We dismiss. We hate. We demonize. We abandon all hope and throw away the key.

And the result is, we go deeper into our judgment that the other person is *so* other that they are no longer allowed to exist. Or be. Or have their own life where they get to find their way back to the light from whatever dark mess they found themselves in. From whatever mess WE found ourselves in.

Because we aren’t any better. At one point or another we have been or will be in the same place, where others will demonize us and say they are correct about our demon blood, and we’ll hopefully remember that this--their view--is just a small window into our world, that there’s a whole lot more to us than they believe. And if we’ve been in the muck before, we’ll just thank them, acknowledge our darkness, and ask them to show us their demons.

And we’ll finally see each other as we hate each other.

But if we don’t kill each other then, there will be one more step. The impossible step.

Hate and love--or at least compassion, understanding, and generosity-- aren’t that different from one another, but it’s a bit of a mind and heart fuck. It’s available when we know their darkness and our darkness isn’t that different even though it is unique and personal. Their suffering and our suffering. Their shadows and our shadows.

This is why the path of mediation works.

Because it allows us to go beyond the competition of “what happened” into the messy reality of how it felt, how it messed with us, and of how it happened in the first place if the mystery of it isn’t so deep in our shadows that we can bear to feel into the truth of who we were and probably still are in it.

Because the path of mediation is a path of intimacy with those we would rather keep separate from us.

Because the path of mediation is a path back to our own inner monster.

To connect with him and to get to know him a bit better. So that he no longers drives us.

So that we can finally work together and integrate him.

Comment

Creating Safer Group & Community Experiences

Comment

Creating Safer Group & Community Experiences

I've been considering the intersection of intentions/agreements/connections as a way to create a field that continues to hold people and their experience long after events, workshops, parties, retreats, trainings--in a particular light and trajectory, ideally in a way that is supportive, sovereign, loving, and growthful.

If these three "subfields" aren't strong enough together in concert/collaboration with each other, participants who don't feel validated and held in their experience in the current field might decide to move to another field (of intentions/agreements/connections) if this new field seems to be better able to hold their experiences and support them in making sense of them safely.

However, this can also cause people to reinterpret their experiences in a way that occurs as more harmful or look from that new field into the old field in a way that seems more harmful.

And fair enough, whichever field they land on will seem to be the one which is the best/safest/truest/most accurate.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Request Languaging: Knowing how to ask makes a difference

Comment

Request Languaging: Knowing how to ask makes a difference

How do you make requests? How do you engage another person with your needs, desires, or ideas in a way that allows them to find their own way and avoid feeling undue pressure if they are more agreeable than you or if you have more power/rank than they have? How do you ensure that an engagement is fully consensual (ready, willing, able, informed) in the face of the nuances of how you relate with another person?

Here's a few examples. Take a moment to feel how each of these would occur on someone else or on you depending on who the other person is and who you are in relationship to them:

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Do You Know How to Have a Clearing Conversation?

Comment

Do You Know How to Have a Clearing Conversation?

Clearing conversations, AKA Repair Conversations (at least for smaller issues) or Mediated Conversations (for the bigger issues) are crucial to maintain relationships of all types and levels as they support arising issues, difficulties, and challenges people may have with each other by creating a space for feelings/emotions, projections, thoughts, feedback, stories, request, boundaries, etc to be expressed cleanly by the giver with the greatest chance of being heard by the receiver.

Over time, without these types of conversations (or the ability for either or both people to integrate them into something real rather than imagined, relationship will slowly (or quickly) deteriorate. One only has to look at their closest relationships to understand how easily it is to make things up about someone else, their needs, their desires, their personality, their fears, their qualities and faults, etc to see the natural propensity for humans to fill in the blanks of their knowing and understanding about someone else and begin to believe their own thoughts more strongly than leaving an open empty question about this person.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

Comment

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

believe, and are now looking for ways to test their new toy.

So what do you do about this?

Don't walk into the trap. It's only for you if you get caught. 

Add "It is my personal opinion that..." in front of their meme to understand that it's not objective truth. 

Also many memes assume something to be true just because it's in the meme, so if you show up and speak otherwise, you just became the target audience for the "denier" of the meme, which will then expose you to a similar trap.

Take a look at the second meme, which, when spelled out, looks like this:

"If you need an illustration of white privilege (ie you're one of those people who need it), and don't think you have privilege, then you needing this illustration is your white privilege talking (and it might also show your fragility for good measure)."

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability and Avoid Conflict

Comment

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability and Avoid Conflict

(Note: In this conversation I will use responsibility to also mean accountability)

For this game we take a whole new look at the conversation around the topic of Responsibility and its role in conflict. Clear your mind of what you know and dive in.

In relationship or any engagement between adults, responsibility is usually something that is shared (to some degree) between all parties involved.

Imagine responsibility as something that can be measured in terms of “quantity”. When responsibility is taken for everything that happens in the engagement/relationship, everyone knows the part they play and to what degree they affect the outcome. Generally, this means everyone is happy in the engagement and there's little conflict: I cook, you do the dishes. You want more touch, you tell me and I respond with more touch. I drive and you navigate. If I'm unhappy, I share with you about it and you know where you can rise up because it's your responsibility. Or you can refuse and I can take responsibility.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

On Anxious Attachers Blaming Their Avoidant Partners

Comment

On Anxious Attachers Blaming Their Avoidant Partners

Classic right?

They are pulling away all the time.

They shut down when you try to bring up a relationship concern.

They don’t respond to their messages in a timely manner.

They don’t meet your needs.

They don’t give you enough reassurance.

They don’t tell you they love you enough.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Pressure: What influences us when we receive a request?

Comment

Pressure: What influences us when we receive a request?

Recently, I had a conversation with a group of friends about the idea that in interactions and specifically requests made by one person towards another, there were various categories of "pressure" felt by the person receiving the request, and influenced at various degrees by the person making the request.

This pressure, mainly, serves to overcome, achieve, or reach consent, meaning it influences someone’s level of readiness, willingness, ability, or information about the nature of the engagement towards the possibility of them consenting to the engagement.

Achieving consent isn't necessarily *bad*: it can look like encouraging/supporting someone who isn't yet a "yes" by giving them what they might need to get there, as a team effort with them in that decision process. And, it can also be one-sided (for the asker who is only focused on/caring for themselves or on the other, or for the person being asked especially if the asker is coming from a place of people pleasing.

(Click the title to read the rest)

Comment

An experience of “LOVEBOMBING” and withdrawal, from the point of view of a “narcissist”

Comment

An experience of “LOVEBOMBING” and withdrawal, from the point of view of a “narcissist”

Note: I use the word “narcissist” as an illustration only, not as a definition for someone. This post is more related to avoidant attachment style)

Someone comes into my field, we connect, and I feel immense love for them. I express this love with an open heart… We share a period of deep Communion, sometimes nearly soul shattering!

As the days go on… I find it more and more difficult to continue giving love and affection at this level… It isn’t sustainable. I am just one person, and their need begins to feel like a deep well.

I have always refilled my own cup by spending time alone…withdrawing from the world. Giving myself the love and attention I need.

Click the title to read more.

Comment

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

Comment

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

I think the quote below is great.

And, it fails to acknowledge the deep need many people have to be chosen, to be someone else's top choice.

Some say "I choose myself first" and fair enough, they do, and everyone else comes second.

Some choose (or nature does) their child(ren).

Some choose their pet.

Some choose their partner.

Some choose each moment, each engagement, each bite of food they ingest.

We forget the power of choosing and being chosen.

(click the title to read more)

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 3

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 3

In Love Letter #1, we looked at how the anxious attachers’ loss-prevention strategies are often the very things that *cause* the loss they’re so afraid of. We looked at it under an electron microscope, so you could see every psychological mechanism (and its impact on others) with excruciating clarity.

In Love Letter #2, we looked at how to do things differently, taking a sober look at how to manage the inevitable intoxication of the falling-in-love drugs, so that you can build a real foundation for your relationship that could last your whole life long.

And in Love Letter #3, we’re going to be looking through the electron microscope once again at just one small piece of the anxious attachment puzzle: our relationship to our own desires and needs.

Let’s jump in…

When we’re really young, we have SO many needs — my god, so many needs. In a “good enough” environment, those needs are mostly met, most of the time, and it’s fine. We don’t need perfection in order to be okay — great, even. But for most of us, there was one thing or another that we really needed, that our environment couldn’t consistently provide (eg. unconditional love, safety, attunement, encouragement, etc.), or there was some part of the environment that was fundamentally broken (eg. family, home, money, sexuality, etc.).

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 2

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 2

Sobriety in the Spike & The Two Transformations

The central point of the first “Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached” was this: anxious attachers are wired up to have stronger feelings (sooner) and to bond deeper (faster) in the beginning of a new relationship. They also tend to rush into lots and lots of intimacy, which means that the need for consistency and security is probably going to come online sooner for them than it will for their lover — which is likely going to be more than that person (or the relationship) are ready for.

A lot of these responses are baked into the nervous system, so it really isn’t a matter of stopping it from happening. Rather, it’s about learning to maintain a degree of mindfulness while it is happening — just enough so that you can make different kinds of choices. I call it “Sobriety in the Spike.”

The “Spike” is that initial stage of relationship where you can’t stop thinking about them, where you’re willing the time to pass until you can see them again, where being with them is the most intoxicatingly pleasurable thing you can possibly imagine. It’s a surge of hormones and neurotransmitters that are doing precisely what they were evolutionarily designed to do. Thing is, the Spike isn’t “like” drugs, it IS drugs, and there are some highly predictable ways that they will distort your perception of reality and compel you do all kinds of things you wouldn’t ordinarily do.
(click the title to read more)

Comment

Why Cultivating Your "Yes" is The Core of Sovereignty

Comment

Why Cultivating Your "Yes" is The Core of Sovereignty

In consent work, it's common to say that consent means someone is ready, willing, able, and informed.

However, what if the only thing missing is someone being *willing*? What if they are ready, able, and informed, but something is still stopping them.

What has someone be willing (or not) to engage in a particular way?

I believe this is where we enter the realm of "free-will" (and of course, the phrase gives it away)

At first glance, you would expect everyone to have free-will and be able to make their own choices--choices which, ostensibly, would feel good and have a positive impact on their life.

But if you look deeper, you'll immediately see that this isn't always the case: people only make choices that are GOOD for them (ie have an effectively positive impact on their life) and perhaps ALSO feel good--or make some level of PAIN and SUFFERING go away.

And so if they lack enough perspective or feelings to make a better choice, they won't.

Why is that? I have a few thoughts...

(click the title to read more)

Comment

Personal Responsibility: Is it for you?

Comment

Personal Responsibility: Is it for you?

For this exploration and inquiry we dive into the realm of (personal) responsibility. What does it take to take responsibility for all things that happen to us? Is it even possible? Does it even make sense? And when we fail, can we take responsibility for *that* too? In transformational circles, many people believe that taking 100% responsibility is not only possible but also *desired*. But what happens when something happens and we just can't take personal responsibility, no matter how much we try? Conflict is often the result. Read on below for the various scenarios possible between two people when impactful words or actions are shared, and then find someone to explore these scenarios with in conversation.

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

What is Reality Cuddling?

Comment

What is Reality Cuddling?

Think of the last time you cuddled with someone. What happened in the seconds and minutes that followed the call to cuddle? Was it smooth, awkward, quick, slow, weird? Did it feel comfy, edgy, scary, good, bad, etc? How many times did it take to really feel the two of you coming together gracefully? How many times did it take for the two of you to learn to do it perfectly and effortlessly?

So there's this thing we do when we meet someone new and decide that we want to connect with them more deeply, more intimately, which is very similar to cuddling. It involves bringing their sense of reality together with ours, which means their preferences, their morality, their perspective, their fears, their experience, and much much more, together with ours for the purpose of reaching a certain level of coherence and shared reality.

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

He has such great genetics!

Comment

He has such great genetics!

A baby boy is born to a young mother and a father, and his father sees that “his hands are almost as big as his head!” He thinks to himself, “yeah, he’s got my genetics.”

The mother and father have come from homes that do not talk about weakness, only success and accomplishment. He loses his cool one day and begins to hit his wife while she takes the punches with one arm and shields the infant boy with the other from the violence. The baby’s mind is soaking in all this unconsciously, and he learns implicitly that the world isn’t safe...little does he know the father also beat her when she was pregnant with him as well. Each event releases excess cortisol within that infant, hindering healthy brain development and setting the stage for perceiving the world as a dangerous place. ...but we all know in this small town that this baby will be okay. After all, “he has such great genetics!”

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

The Anxious Impact on the Anxious/Avoidant Dance (Part 1)

Comment

The Anxious Impact on the Anxious/Avoidant Dance (Part 1)

Maybe it's over lackluster date nights. Maybe it's about intimate or difficult conversations. Maybe its romantic gestures. Maybe its verbal affirmations.

Whatever the case may be, our dissatisfaction can only be held on to for so long before it seeps out and tarnishes the surrounding environment. It feeds a divisive, resentful, contemptuous atmosphere. It doesnt matter what the desire is, or how valid it is to desire (which it usually is very valid!).. it matters that our deep inner culture of dissatisfaction will erode any potential for improvement, and invite only further dissatisfaction to the party.

When we look at the different core wounds of the AP and DA characters, it can often be described as :

  • an anxious types core wound of abandonment or neglect and

  • a dismissive types core wound of shame or criticism.

The way these characters demonstrate protection of those core wounds, can often look like hypervigilance and hypersensitivity to anything that resembles those core types of pain. Where they branch apart, is often in how they address that hypersensitivity.

Click the title to read more.

Comment

The Anxious Gateway Out of the Anxious/Avoidant Dance (Part 2)

Comment

The Anxious Gateway Out of the Anxious/Avoidant Dance (Part 2)

After reflecting on the feedback on my part 1 of this post, I believe there’s a lot of interest in revealing the secret strategy to having our needs met by our dismissive leaning partners. A sort of "How To Ask So We Get a Yes" guidebook. A script to follow to override our partners avoidant reluctance.

I sense there will be a fair bit of disappointment when I confess .. that's not what I have prepared for you. I can't write out any special vocabulary to guarantee you will see affirmative action. There are no secret cheat codes to hack into the hidden core of needs-meetingness in our partners. I cant give you a password to unlocking whatever form of connection your partner has been "withholding".

I'm here to help us AP leaning folks take a look inward, to find the REAL gateway to sustainable progress, so we can experience the fulfillment we deserve and desire. Stay with me, I promise this gets better ♡

Within each of us exists a small fragment of person, representing our innermost childlike persona. Whatever joyful childlike wonders, whatever most natural desires, whatever most innocent fears, and whatever unresolved trauma we carry from our formative years, we retain within this persona. Being disconnected from this "small inner us" doesn’t remove them from the equation, it just blocks "big outer us" from perceiving and acting on what they need us to do. Adult attachment is this "small inner us", in action. (Yes, dismissive types have a "small them" tagging along too, but very rarely is that persona accessible for them in the early stages.)

Click the title to read more.

Comment